Acquisition Does Not Change Employment Relationship

 

 

ACQUISITION DOES NOT CHANGE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP

Acquisition, Merger, and Consolidation of Limited Liability Companies are generally regulated in Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies. Furthermore, the implementation of acquisition will involve many legal aspects which are regulated in many legal provisions.

In relation to the status of the target company's employees after the acquisition, it is regulated in Law no. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation Law as well as Law no. 13 of 2003 on Manpower.

 

In general, the status of the employees of the target company after an acquisition does not change. The employees are still bound by the employment relationship with the target company that remains standing. The acquisition will cause the shareholders of the target company to change, but will not cause the target company to dissolve.

However, in practice, from previous experiences, not all employees will agree with the acquisition. Those who do not agree may prefer to terminate their employment relationship (also known as PHK).

 

In accordance with the provisions of the Job Creation Law and the Manpower Law, employees who choose to be laid off can apply for severance pay, service pay, and compensation of rights that should have been received.

For instance, severance pay is given in the amount of 2 months' wages for employees who have worked for more than 1 year, but less than 2 years. While service pay is given in the amount of 2 months' wages for employees who have worked for 3 years or more, but less than 6 years. Lastly, compensation is given for things such as paid leave that has not been taken as well as reimbursement of other rights that are regulated in the Collective Labor Agreement (also known as PKB).

 

In practice, it is not uncommon for employees through their unions to ask for rights more than what is stipulated in the law. Case-by-case settlement can be carried out, in accordance with the PKB that applies to them. While the PKB itself is regulated in the Minister of Manpower Regulation No. 28 of 2014.

 

_______________________

Said, Sudiro & Partners

Indonesian Legal Consultants

Sampoerna Strategic Square

South Tower, Level 30

Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45 - 46

Jakarta 12930 Indonesia

Phone: (62-21) 575.0983

Fax: (62-21) 575.0803

Website: www.ssplegal.com

Emails: mail@ssplegal.com

           sdsdp@cbn.net.id

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Legal Due Diligence Pada Proses Akuisisi

Image
                           Legal Due Diligence Pada Proses Akuisisi   Dalam proses akuisisi suatu perseroan, tentu acquiring company perlu mengetahui secara mendalam situasi pada target company. Maka firma hukum akan melakukan pemeriksaan secara seksama melalui dokumen-dokumen terkait dengan target company.   Secara umum acquiring company perlu mengetahui legal status daripada target company. Dengan memeriksa Anggaran Dasar target company, dapat diketahui tentang keabsahan pendirian perseroan tersebut, para pemegang saham, para Direksi dan dewan Komisaris target company. Dalam hal ini menjadi crucial untuk memeriksa notulen RUPS dan Circular Resolution of Shareholders. Seringkali ditemukan hasil RUPS dan Circular Resolution of Shareholders yang isinya belum dituangkan dalam Anggaran Dasar, ataupun tidak diatur dalam Anggaran Dasar. Misalnya pengangkatan Direksi atau Komisaris baru, ataupun perubahan pemegang saham dan modal perseroan yang belum sempat dimasukkan dalam Anggaran Da
Read more

ACQUISITION/TAKEOVER

Image
      ACQUISITION/TAKEOVER In our experience, an acquisition or a takeover is often carried out to gain control of a company. For the acquiring company, an acquisition is considered as an easier way to enter a certain business field, rather than having to establish a new company, which will take time and cost in obtaining all kinds of permits needed to get the business running. For example, a foreign mining company or foreign airline that is financially stronger may try to acquire a company in Indonesia that has enough experience in running its business but is financially weaker. It is not uncommon for this share takeover to be carried out by an investor/investment company in the development of its business.   By owning the majority of shares of the target company, the acquiring company has a bigger chance of securing votes in the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS). One example is that the acquiring company has a greater chance of appointing members of the Board of Direc
Read more